|
Individual Project Related Assessment
**As mentioned in the introduction to CITS3200 on the home page, in accordance with
the University policy on assessment, all team members in a group project must be awarded the same mark.
The policy also says that group-based marks can account for no more than 30% of final mark, unless
there is individual-based moderation of the mark.
In the case of CITS3200, this means the Team marks for the three Sprints will be
moderated via a Relative Performance Factor multiplier created via the SPARKPLUS web application (see discussion below).
For the 45% of the final mark related to the project (i.e.
excluding an individual Professional Development Portfolio):
- Sprint Reflections (15%)
Fifteen percent of the final mark is made up of structured reflections for the 3 Sprints, i.e. 5% each.
Each Sprint has its own reflection document, linked to the Sprint Definition page.
The UWA service StudySmarter
has nice (and short) guide to writing reflections.
- Professionalism (10%)
There will be mark for Professionalism, as judged by the Project Auditor and Unit
Coordinator based on observations across the project timeline, but particularly on
team meetings that the auditor will attend.
Please see the discussion of what Professionalism encompasses and an
associated rubric.
- Contribution (20%)
There is a mark, worth 20% of the overall assessment, for contribution. That is, the mark reflects the total effort
you have put into the project, as recorded in the Booked Hours and supported by submissions to GitHub.
The mark will simply be 2 times the number of hours divided by 10 (rounded to 1 decimal place).
More ambitious projects will therefore, in general, result in higher marks for this component
as the projects require more work,
but please realise that the couple of extra marks are not worth jeopardizing your other units.
The total Booked Hours should include formal team or client meetings (i.e. minuted meetings), but not the many informal
conversations you will, no doubt, have.
Booked hours may also include time required to pick up new skills
or learn about the project background.
However, the time for learning new skills or gaining background knowledge will be limited to
no more than 20% of the total hours that have been claimed.
- Peer Assessment (**)
Contribution will also be peer-assessed at the end of each Sprint by members of your team
using SPARKPLUS.
This generates a floating point number, called a Relative Performance Factor (RPF), in the range 0 .. 1.5,
typically around 1.0.
Each assessment will be used as a moderator, i.e. a multiplier, which will be combined
with the Team Sprint mark to
arrive at an individual mark for that Sprint.
Details of how to get started with SPARKPLUS, and how to use it at the
end of each Sprint, can be found here.
Please note that, in line with UWA Assessment policy, there is a late penalty for late
submission of your SPARKPLUS team analyses of 5% (i.e. 0.05) per day late,
but in this case it will be capped at 10%
Weekly Deliverables
In many industries is it standard that teams have minuted meetings on a regular basis, and that time working on
particular projects is charged to project clients.
We will be doing somethign similar in this unit.
Specifically, it is expected that:
|