Personal Reflection Marking Criteria

A Reflection is to be marked out of 10 (so will be divided by 2 to get the final mark). The score reflects the quality of the reflection, taking into account both the content and how the reflection is expressed. It is assumed that the responses to each question will be in thoughtful, high quality English paragraphs, not point-form.

NOTE

• As with your other written work at UWA, Reflections will be scanned by plagiarism detection systems. In any case, there should be no need to look at any other works, given that these are meant to be your personal reflections. On the same basis, use of ChatGPT or similar text generators is only permitted to improve expression; it should never be used for the content of your reflection!
• You are to submit the reflection as a .docx/.pdf file electronically via LMS.

0 ≤ N < 1

Not submitted, or totally incomprehensible

1 ≤ N < 3

Glimmers of understanding about the questions being asked, or ChatGPT-looking text, i.e. nice sounding, but otherwise vacuous. Or major flaws in the writing

3 ≤ N < 5

Substandard. Trite or flippant responses, or significant flaws in the writing, e.g. use of tenses, singulars and plurals

5 ≤ N < 7

Showing some understanding of the intent of the questions and beginning of insight about team processes and interactions or intension moderately clear, but some lapses in grammar or punctuation

7 ≤ N < 9

Genuine understanding of one's role in the team, what was being attempted and what may be learned; Clear writing, only very minor language issues

9 ≤ N ≤ 10

Stunning work, acute observations peerlessly expressed (use this mark sparingly).